![]() |
Greg Mulholland MP Member of Parliament for Leeds North West |
![]() |
| Greg Mulholland MP | <info@gregmulholland.org> |
POST OFFICE CLOSURES ARE A BETRAYAL - MULHOLLAND12.00.00am UTC (GMT +0000) Thu 14th Dec 2006 Responding to the Government's announcement today on the future of the post office network, Liberal Democrat MP and Member of the Work and Pensions Select Committee, Greg Mulholland, has attacked the Government for failing to address the future of Royal Mail. Commenting, Mr Mulholland said: "This is the end for thousands of local shops and rural businesses that depend on their local post office. "Rural and deprived urban communities will feel betrayed by these mass post office closures. "Unless Ministers free post offices from Royal Mail's restrictive contracts, even more closures can be expected. "The Government's failure to announce plans on Royal Mail is an astonishing dereliction of duty and smacks of political cowardice; they are clearly not willing to take the tough decisions which will secure Royal Mail's future. "If tough decisions on Royal Mail had been taken, the freedoms and funds for saving post offices could have been found. Without them, both Royal Mail and the post office network will die a slow death. "Our postal services have a proud 300 year history which this Government has decimated in less than a decade."
Bookmark this story at:
Related News Stories:Tue 11th Nov 2008: "LAST POST WILL SOUND FOR NATIONAL POST OFFICE NETWORK WITHOUT CARD ACCOUNT" - MULHOLLAND . Thu 24th Jul 2008: Mon 16th Jun 2008: MULHOLLAND - "THE POST OFFICE MUST LISTEN TO THE PEOPLE OF BRAMHOPE". Wed 14th May 2008: POST OFFICE CLOSURES DEVASTATING NEWS FOR OUR AREA - MULHOLLAND. Tue 13th May 2008: FAR HEADINGLEY POST OFFICE CLOSURE DEVASTATING NEWS FOR THE AREA - MULHOLLAND. Thu 30th Nov 2006: MULHOLLAND DELIGHTED BY BRAMHOPE POST OFFICE REOPENING. Thu 2nd Dec 2004: Promoted by R.Jacques on behalf of Leeds North West Liberal Democrats, all at 12 Holt Park Centre, Leeds LS16 7SR The views expressed are those of the party, not of the service provider. |